copy of letter dated 4-6-2005 to J M Chaudhary
Pankaj S Mody
Janmangal Flat
40 Brhaman Mitra Manda Society
Ahmedabad 380 006
04-06-2005
The Police Inspector ,
Anti Economic Offence Wing
Meghaninagar , Ahmedabad
Respected Sir,
For the Kind attention of Shri J M Chaudhary
Subject :- In connection of Banking fraud pertaining to GTB in relation to my email to the Honorable Chief Minister of Gujarat from time to time
This is further to my letter addressed to you on 26-5-2005 so as to enable you to systematically investigate the fraudulent acts of Jatin Jalundhwala in collusion with bankers and others. In my letter addressed on 26-5-2005 , I dealt interrogation to be carried out on GTB officials.
It is necessary to call for detailed reply from Jatin Jalundhwala as under as he has launched criminal case against the undersigned:-
a) He is called upon to narrate in detail as to when he obtained various documents from the escrow persons which enabled him to justify control of the companies called Rupmangalam and Flovin and written confirmation from the escrow persons specifying the dates when they gave various documents so that Jalundhwala can claim ownership of the companies called Rupmangalam Investment Pvt Ltd and Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd.
b) He is called upon to furnish a ROC certified copy of document Form 32 filed with ROC showing that additional directorship has been renewed after the expiry of his term as additional directorship in case of Rupmaglam Investment Pvt Ltd along with the details of filing fees of ROC.
c) His own reply to the reply given by K V Shelat on 18-1-99 and 1-2-99 pursuant to the notice given by Dhanyushya through A D Shah.
d) He is called upon to explain in his own words as to why he arranged guarantee for Core Health care through Rupmangalam Investment Pvt Ltd and Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd.and his correspondence with GTB in this regard .
e) His own reply to the letter addressed to vigilance department on 24-7-99 of GTB
.
f) His correspondence with Hemant kashiparekh pursuant to the letter to Hemant Kashiparekh on 29-7-99 and detailed reply of Kashiparekh.
g) His own correspondence with the escrow persons consisting of Saurabh Soparkar and Hemant Kashiparekh from time to time and their reply to him.
h) In his own words as to how amalagamation of Rupmangalam and Flovin Plastics was carried out with Span Medicals , why it was carried out and who filed the necessary application on behalf of the companies to the High court.
i) His own reply as to why he has failed to furnish details to the court commissioner on 10-1-2002 especially when the office of Span Medicals when the office of Span Medicals was adjacent to the office of Core Health care .
j) He is called upon to furnish documentary evidences called for in the civil suit 5827/2001 which were referred in appeal from order 176/2003.
k) His own recorded statement as to why he chose to remain absent in the civil revision application 25 and 26/2002 or not engage advocate.
l) His own recorded statement as to why he delayed giving reply to the city civil court by April 26, 2002 as bhadra court was working on that day.
m) His own reply to the written arguments submitted on 11-3-2003 and 17-3-2003 to the city civil court.
n) His detailed reply to the appeal from order 176/2003.
o) His own comments to the reply given by A D Shah pursuant to the notice given to Core Healthcare on 12-1-2000.
p) To get copy of all documents filed with Registar of companies pertaining to Rupmangalam , Flovin, Dhanyushya , Core Health care , Span Medicals, Technology Finance from 1-4-1995 onwards from Jalundhwala.
q) To get copies of all sanction papers of term loan of Rs 11 crores as referred in court commissioner report.
r) In case he and Ameet Desai were sole directors of Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd , why did he and Desai not route payment through Flovin Plastics account with Textiles Traders account to Bank of India from April 1997 onwards as referred in reply given by Ashok D Shah.
s) Why it was necessary for Jatin to subject for police remand for a paltry sum of Rs eight lakhs when you have been generous in giving term loan of Rs 12.5 crores to Core Health care and have not taken legal action against Core Health care and their directors. This is nothing but penny wise and pound foolish.
t) It is necessary to collect details about location of Ameet Desai. Perhaps he is working with Ranbaxy Ltd and he is in New Delhi.
u) Jalundhwla is called upon to furnish audited balance sheet of Dhanyushya which shows that all the shares of Mody family are transferred simultaneously to Dhanyushya .
v) What was the reason for accepting alleged resignation in September 1996 in case of Rupmanglam when Dhanyushya had grievance against the directors of Flovin as apparent from the notice ON October 14 1998.
w) Why did you not vent out grievances to the escrow persons at the time of taking delivery of shares belonging to Himanshu Mody and Suresh Mody family family in 1998 where by you had to lodge criminal case against the directors of Flovin.
x) Jalundhwala is called upon to furnish a copy of the bank sanction letter for term loan of Rs 11.00 crores as referred in the court commissioner report in January 2002.
As Core Health care has defaulted on term loan of Rs 12.5 crores loan , it is necessary to subject Jatin Jalundhwala RUTHLESS interrogation to detect banking fraud by producing him before the metropolitan court so that he can be cross examined by my representative as I have been humiliated and has been cause for disrupting my family life by causing terror during the police remand.
I most humbly request you that you that you refrain from maintaining a soft and lenient approach while interrogating Jatin Jalundhwala and the banking officials of Oriental Bank of Commerce in case they exert pressure through their vast contacts.
I would very much appreciate that Jatin Jalundhwala statements and documentary evidences are available to me immediately on receipt of this letter because the next due date of hearing is fixed for hearing on 15-6-2005 in criminal defamation case 3326/1999 launched by Core Health care.
It is necessary that Sushil Handa , Jatin Jalundhwala and the officials of Global Trust Bank are compelled to appear in the Metropolitan Court on 15-6-2005 the proceedings of criminal defamation case 3326/1999
I most humbly request you that you would be kind enough to give copy of detailed replies and documentary evidences from Jatin Jalundhwala , Banking officials as well as my brother Himanshu well in advance so that I can give a reply after going through the papers while respecting your time constraints. You would be kind enough to appreciate that it is impossible for me to give reply in the form of questions raised by you where the answer is expected immediately from the undersigned which deprives me to present connected information creating confusion, misinterpretation.
I understand from your brief verbal comment that my brother has avoided presence of of escrow persons consisting of Hemant Kashiparekh and Saurabh Soparkar and so also my father Shri Suresh Mody has not referred while taking their reply. Kindly seek their clarification and furnish a copy of their reply before I raised additional issues.
I would like to draw your attention that till date no one has come forward from the Police Commissioner's office or Navrangpura Police station to arrange for my protection inspite of your intimation to them around 18 th May 2005. It appears that no one is really bothered in protecting a person during investigation inspite of directions given from the top.
Only after receipt of this information , I would be able to make my detailed additional comments.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Pankaj S Mody
Janmangal Flat
40 Brhaman Mitra Manda Society
Ahmedabad 380 006
04-06-2005
The Police Inspector ,
Anti Economic Offence Wing
Meghaninagar , Ahmedabad
Respected Sir,
For the Kind attention of Shri J M Chaudhary
Subject :- In connection of Banking fraud pertaining to GTB in relation to my email to the Honorable Chief Minister of Gujarat from time to time
This is further to my letter addressed to you on 26-5-2005 so as to enable you to systematically investigate the fraudulent acts of Jatin Jalundhwala in collusion with bankers and others. In my letter addressed on 26-5-2005 , I dealt interrogation to be carried out on GTB officials.
It is necessary to call for detailed reply from Jatin Jalundhwala as under as he has launched criminal case against the undersigned:-
a) He is called upon to narrate in detail as to when he obtained various documents from the escrow persons which enabled him to justify control of the companies called Rupmangalam and Flovin and written confirmation from the escrow persons specifying the dates when they gave various documents so that Jalundhwala can claim ownership of the companies called Rupmangalam Investment Pvt Ltd and Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd.
b) He is called upon to furnish a ROC certified copy of document Form 32 filed with ROC showing that additional directorship has been renewed after the expiry of his term as additional directorship in case of Rupmaglam Investment Pvt Ltd along with the details of filing fees of ROC.
c) His own reply to the reply given by K V Shelat on 18-1-99 and 1-2-99 pursuant to the notice given by Dhanyushya through A D Shah.
d) He is called upon to explain in his own words as to why he arranged guarantee for Core Health care through Rupmangalam Investment Pvt Ltd and Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd.and his correspondence with GTB in this regard .
e) His own reply to the letter addressed to vigilance department on 24-7-99 of GTB
.
f) His correspondence with Hemant kashiparekh pursuant to the letter to Hemant Kashiparekh on 29-7-99 and detailed reply of Kashiparekh.
g) His own correspondence with the escrow persons consisting of Saurabh Soparkar and Hemant Kashiparekh from time to time and their reply to him.
h) In his own words as to how amalagamation of Rupmangalam and Flovin Plastics was carried out with Span Medicals , why it was carried out and who filed the necessary application on behalf of the companies to the High court.
i) His own reply as to why he has failed to furnish details to the court commissioner on 10-1-2002 especially when the office of Span Medicals when the office of Span Medicals was adjacent to the office of Core Health care .
j) He is called upon to furnish documentary evidences called for in the civil suit 5827/2001 which were referred in appeal from order 176/2003.
k) His own recorded statement as to why he chose to remain absent in the civil revision application 25 and 26/2002 or not engage advocate.
l) His own recorded statement as to why he delayed giving reply to the city civil court by April 26, 2002 as bhadra court was working on that day.
m) His own reply to the written arguments submitted on 11-3-2003 and 17-3-2003 to the city civil court.
n) His detailed reply to the appeal from order 176/2003.
o) His own comments to the reply given by A D Shah pursuant to the notice given to Core Healthcare on 12-1-2000.
p) To get copy of all documents filed with Registar of companies pertaining to Rupmangalam , Flovin, Dhanyushya , Core Health care , Span Medicals, Technology Finance from 1-4-1995 onwards from Jalundhwala.
q) To get copies of all sanction papers of term loan of Rs 11 crores as referred in court commissioner report.
r) In case he and Ameet Desai were sole directors of Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd , why did he and Desai not route payment through Flovin Plastics account with Textiles Traders account to Bank of India from April 1997 onwards as referred in reply given by Ashok D Shah.
s) Why it was necessary for Jatin to subject for police remand for a paltry sum of Rs eight lakhs when you have been generous in giving term loan of Rs 12.5 crores to Core Health care and have not taken legal action against Core Health care and their directors. This is nothing but penny wise and pound foolish.
t) It is necessary to collect details about location of Ameet Desai. Perhaps he is working with Ranbaxy Ltd and he is in New Delhi.
u) Jalundhwla is called upon to furnish audited balance sheet of Dhanyushya which shows that all the shares of Mody family are transferred simultaneously to Dhanyushya .
v) What was the reason for accepting alleged resignation in September 1996 in case of Rupmanglam when Dhanyushya had grievance against the directors of Flovin as apparent from the notice ON October 14 1998.
w) Why did you not vent out grievances to the escrow persons at the time of taking delivery of shares belonging to Himanshu Mody and Suresh Mody family family in 1998 where by you had to lodge criminal case against the directors of Flovin.
x) Jalundhwala is called upon to furnish a copy of the bank sanction letter for term loan of Rs 11.00 crores as referred in the court commissioner report in January 2002.
As Core Health care has defaulted on term loan of Rs 12.5 crores loan , it is necessary to subject Jatin Jalundhwala RUTHLESS interrogation to detect banking fraud by producing him before the metropolitan court so that he can be cross examined by my representative as I have been humiliated and has been cause for disrupting my family life by causing terror during the police remand.
I most humbly request you that you that you refrain from maintaining a soft and lenient approach while interrogating Jatin Jalundhwala and the banking officials of Oriental Bank of Commerce in case they exert pressure through their vast contacts.
I would very much appreciate that Jatin Jalundhwala statements and documentary evidences are available to me immediately on receipt of this letter because the next due date of hearing is fixed for hearing on 15-6-2005 in criminal defamation case 3326/1999 launched by Core Health care.
It is necessary that Sushil Handa , Jatin Jalundhwala and the officials of Global Trust Bank are compelled to appear in the Metropolitan Court on 15-6-2005 the proceedings of criminal defamation case 3326/1999
I most humbly request you that you would be kind enough to give copy of detailed replies and documentary evidences from Jatin Jalundhwala , Banking officials as well as my brother Himanshu well in advance so that I can give a reply after going through the papers while respecting your time constraints. You would be kind enough to appreciate that it is impossible for me to give reply in the form of questions raised by you where the answer is expected immediately from the undersigned which deprives me to present connected information creating confusion, misinterpretation.
I understand from your brief verbal comment that my brother has avoided presence of of escrow persons consisting of Hemant Kashiparekh and Saurabh Soparkar and so also my father Shri Suresh Mody has not referred while taking their reply. Kindly seek their clarification and furnish a copy of their reply before I raised additional issues.
I would like to draw your attention that till date no one has come forward from the Police Commissioner's office or Navrangpura Police station to arrange for my protection inspite of your intimation to them around 18 th May 2005. It appears that no one is really bothered in protecting a person during investigation inspite of directions given from the top.
Only after receipt of this information , I would be able to make my detailed additional comments.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Pankaj S Mody
posted by WHISTLE @ 6:12 AM
